When is the time right to replace your current product configurator with HiveCPQ?
Complex and powerful product configurators are often the backbone of a manufacturers organisation. It is an engine to validate input and generate crucial output information like pricing, bill of materials, bill of labour, complex calculations and more. However, lots of configurators no longer meet today's market standards. Let's take a look.
Product configurators
Manufacturers often have implemented product configurators years ago, and have invested years into the fine-tuning and maintenance of their configurators. Unfortunately, often, these configurators do no longer meet market standards. They often are slow, don’t fully support ‘the web’, look as they come from the Middle Ages. On top of that they cannot be used in multiple applications (CRM, website, lead generation, webshops,…) and it takes a specialist to fill in the inputs in a correct way.
Today’s modern configurators are fast, visually appealing and can be used for multiple purposes and scenario’s. When is your ‘old’ configurator old enough to replace it with a new one? It is a though question.
When is the time right to replace your product configurator?
For starters, it is not always needed to immediately decommission your old configurator. When we make a HiveCPQ implementation it happens we build Hive as a commercial configurator that will support the sales process. Once the order is placed, Hive can supply all inputs to the old configurator module, who in turn will generate all appropriate information for the production.
The advantage of such approach?
- The ‘old’ configurator is no longer used during the sales process
- The ‘new’ configurator does not have to contain all information, but can be a simplified version at the start. Making it faster, more agile and more friendly to its users
- Business logic can be moved gradually into the new configurator. This makes it easier to entirely replace the old one, over time
The disadvantages of such approach?
- There will be maintenance of two configurator engines. Each with its own purpose though. One for sales, the other for production. With a clear goal in mind, decommission the old one.
A good way to support two configurators at the same time, is to make sure they refer to the same ‘master data’. The Hive configurator for example, can use external validation rules to validate a model.
On the other hand, completely replacing it is often the right choice!
If you compare old engines to a modern engine, it is a world of difference. Today, with modern technology, the development of a configurator is easily 10 times faster as it is with old technology. Especially in the maintenance part of the configurator models.
Struggling with your current configurator and wondering if it's time to replace it?
Folge uns
Related articles
Demonstrate the feasibility of CPQ with a Proof Of Concept
Since the beginning of Hive, we have started nearly all our Configure Price Quote projects with a Proof of Concept, which we have called a Seeing Is Believing or SIB. What exactly does our Seeing Is Believing entail? What are the advantages of this approach and which results can you expect on which time frame?
Economic Uncertainty? The Value of Investing in CPQ During Times of Crisis
In times of economic uncertainty, manufacturing enterprises are often challenged with reluctance to making business investments. Economic crises tend to trigger cost-cutting measures and cautious spending. However, Configure Price Quote (CPQ) solutions can be considered as an exception, since it forms an essential tool to support sales and provide potential benefits. Let’s take a look at why investing in CPQ in times of crisis is so crucial.
CPQ vs ecommerce: Exploring the differences and complementarity
In today’s rapidly changing economy, companies are always on the lookout for ways to improve their sales processes. In recent years, Configure Price Quote software and ecommerce have proven to be useful tools for these companies to sell their products and services in an easy way. While the two approaches might seem similar at first, there are some key differences that are important to consider. Let’s take a look at these two online solutions, their similarities and differences, and how they can complement each other to help businesses grow.
