02 20 Replace config w Hive web

When is the time right to replace your current product configurator with Hive CPQ?

Complex and powerful product configurators are often the backbone of a manufacturers organisation. It is an engine to validate input and generate crucial output information like pricing, bill of materials, bill of labour, complex calculations and more. However, lots of configurators no longer meet today's market standards. Let's take a look. 

Frederik
February 06, 2020 Written by
Frederik Taleman

Product configurators

Manufacturers often have implemented product configurators years ago, and have invested years into the fine-tuning and maintenance of their configurators. Unfortunately, often, these configurators do no longer meet market standards. They often are slow, don’t fully support ‘the web’, look as they come from the Middle Ages. On top of that they cannot be used in multiple applications (CRM, website, lead generation, webshops,…) and it takes a specialist to fill in the inputs in a correct way.

Today’s modern configurators are fast, visually appealing and can be used for multiple purposes and scenario’s. When is your ‘old’ configurator old enough to replace it with a new one? It is a though question.

When is the time right to replace your product configurator?

For starters, it is not always needed to immediately decommission your old configurator. When we make a Hive CPQ implementation it happens we build Hive as a commercial configurator that will support the sales process. Once the order is placed, Hive can supply all inputs to the old configurator module, who in turn will generate all appropriate information for the production.

The advantage of such approach?

  • The ‘old’ configurator is no longer used during the sales process
  • The ‘new’ configurator does not have to contain all information, but can be a simplified version at the start. Making it faster, more agile and more friendly to its users
  • Business logic can be moved gradually into the new configurator. This makes it easier to entirely replace the old one, over time

The disadvantages of such approach?

  • There will be maintenance of two configurator engines. Each with its own purpose though. One for sales, the other for production. With a clear goal in mind, decommission the old one.

A good way to support two configurators at the same time, is to make sure they refer to the same ‘master data’. The Hive configurator for example, can use external validation rules to validate a model. 

On the other hand, completely replacing it is often the right choice!

If you compare old engines to a modern engine, it is a world of difference. Today, with modern technology, the development of a configurator is easily 10 times faster as it is with old technology. Especially in the maintenance part of the configurator models.

Struggling with your current configurator and wondering if it's time to replace it?

Related articles

Signs it’s time to consider switching your CPQ software
08 22 Switch CPQ web
September 01, 2022 Written by
CPQ software

Signs it’s time to consider switching your CPQ software

CPQ or Configure, Price, Quote software helps companies worldwide to market and sell complex products more efficiently. The software offers a bunch of benefits but when it is outdated, slow, or complex, it might have the counterproductive effect. In that case, looking into a different CPQ provider that better fits your business case might help you get back on track. Let’s dive into some signs it’s time to consider switching CPQ softwares.

read more
A comprehensive comparison: Online vs. offline product configurators
Hive Website 600x420px WEB Online vs Offiline 01
July 27, 2023 Written by
Sales optimalisation CPQ software

A comprehensive comparison: Online vs. offline product configurators

More than ever, manufacturers are relying on product configurators to customize their complex product offerings. However, the choice between an online and an offline product configurator can significantly impact the operations. Whether for habitual or company-specific reasons, the debate between online and offline software continues to be a hot topic. Let’s take a look at what the differences are and how to make an informed choice for your business case.

read more
Demonstrate the feasibility of CPQ with a Proof Of Concept
03 23 SIB web NEW
March 22, 2023 Written by
CPQ software Hive methodology

Demonstrate the feasibility of CPQ with a Proof Of Concept

Since the beginning of Hive, we have started nearly all our Configure Price Quote projects with a Proof of Concept, which we have called a Seeing Is Believing or SIB. What exactly does our Seeing Is Believing entail? What are the advantages of this approach and which results can you expect on which time frame?

read more